Google Stitch (formerly Galileo AI) vs Uizard
Google Stitch (formerly Galileo AI) and Uizard both use AI to generate UI designs, but they target different users. Stitch produces higher-fidelity, more polished outputs and exports cleanly to Figma — and it's currently free in beta after Google's acquisition. Uizard shines at converting sketches and screenshots into wireframes for non-designers, backed by Miro.
Google Stitch (formerly Galileo AI)
Choose if: You're a designer or PM who wants polished, high-fidelity UI generated from text prompts with strong Figma export.
Text-to-UI design generation, now part of Google
Uizard
Choose if: You're a non-designer who wants to turn hand-drawn sketches or competitor screenshots into editable wireframes quickly.
AI-powered wireframes from sketches, screenshots, and text
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Google Stitch (formerly Galileo AI) | Uizard |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free (beta)✓ | $19/mo |
| Free tier | Free in beta with limits✓ | 3 AI generations/month |
| Output fidelity | High-fidelity polished UI✓ | Wireframe to mid-fidelity |
| Figma export | Native, preserves structure✓ | No native export (SVG workaround) |
| Sketch-to-design | No | Yes — photo to wireframe✓ |
| Screenshot scanning | No | Yes — editable components✓ |
| Learning curve | Low | Very low✓ |
| Target audience | Designers & PMs | Non-designers & PMs |
| Team plan price | Free (beta)✓ | $39/mo (Business) |
Pricing Comparison
Google Stitch (formerly Galileo AI)
| Free | $0 |
+ Acquired by Google and rebranded as Stitch — currently free in beta, Pricing model expected to change after beta
Uizard
| Free | $0 |
| ProPopular | $19/mo |
| Business | $39/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom |
+ Per-user pricing — costs scale with team size, Acquired by Miro in 2024 — future pricing changes possible, No native Figma export — SVG workaround on Pro only, Discounts available with annual billing
Pricing last verified: 2026-05-12
Google Stitch (formerly Galileo AI): Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Generates polished, high-fidelity UI from simple text prompts
- +Strong Figma export preserving component structure
- +Supports both mobile and web design in multiple styles
- +Fast iteration — generate dozens of variations in minutes
Limitations
- -Generated designs often default to a Material Design aesthetic
- -Output requires manual refinement in traditional design tools for production use
- -Vague prompts produce generic, template-like results
- -Limited customization of generation style and constraints
Uizard: Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Converts hand-drawn sketches into digital wireframes automatically
- +Screenshot Scanner turns any app screenshot into editable components
- +Autodesigner generates multi-screen flows from a single text prompt
- +Very low learning curve — purpose-built for people without design experience
Limitations
- -Generated designs often have an obvious AI look with inconsistent alignment
- -Complex prompts frequently get only partially followed, wasting AI credits
- -No native Figma export — only SVG workaround that loses interactions
- -Free plan's 3 AI generations per month is too few to properly evaluate the tool
Which One Should You Pick?
Google Stitch (formerly Galileo AI) is best for: Designers and PMs who want AI-generated UI starting points.
Uizard is best for: Non-designers and product managers who need quick wireframes from sketches or text.
Last updated: 2026-05-12